Official home of the QBism group
…is the title of a new popular article by Blake, which just appeared on iai news. In it, Blake says provocatively: [B]oth Alice and the atom participate in the measurement event; both partake in the creation of a new fact for the pair of them. And if the atom can participate in such ongoing acts […]
…all of these ingredients can be found blended together smoothly in this video made by Blake, John and Matt. A gentle sunlit excursion into the far reaches of mathematical symmetry.
As promised, my paper comparing QBism and Rovelli’s relational interpretation of quantum mechanics (RQM) is finally on the arXiv; you can upvote it or comment on it on Scirate. One of the things that made this paper tricky to write was trying to explain how QBism can talk about “reality without agents” and yet at […]
There’s a long story behind this paper, but I’m too busy to write it right now. Just go check it out (click the image):
Ah, that fresh new-website smell! With Jacques’ post about more conceptual matters having just started us off, I figured it would be a good time to make a note on the technical side. Sisters, misters and dichotomy resisters, I present to you A First Course in the Sporadic SICs, SpringerBriefs in Mathematical Physics volume 41 […]
As the person tasked with setting up this QBism website, I’m going to inaugurate it with a shameless plug of my own paper that just came out on the arXiv: A quintet of quandaries: five no-go theorems for Relational Quantum Mechanics. As the title suggests, the paper is a critique of the relational interpretation of […]